[MCR] Coast Snow and Avalanche Observation Flight

Subject: [MCR] Coast Snow and Avalanche Observation Flight
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 05:43:54 +0000
Hi All,

I went of a 2 hour flight today to check out a couple of operations for which we are forecasting avalanche hazard. The flight took us from Squamish southeast over to the Fraser River just north of Hope up to the south end of the Stein then back across just south of Whislter over to the Squamish Elaho confluence and south to Squamish.

The weather was generally good with a high overcast. A layer of marine cloud was crawling north from the lower mainland at about 5500-6500 feet but was broken and ended at the north end of the big fjordal lakes (Pitt, Stave, Harrison etc.). East of the Lillooet drainage there was a 30-50km NW wind that was transporting a lot of snow and made for a queazy flight. At 5000' it was -10deg and at 8000' it was 0 deg.


Below are some observations cut from the report I wrote about the flight for the clients:

GOAL:


The aim of this flight was to assess the snowpack that has developed over the last month. A secondary but equally important part of the flight was to see how much snow fell in the last weather event and see if any of the weaker layers that have been observed throughout the industry are becoming reactive.


FINDINGS:


  • There was a significant inversion. It was -10ºC at 1500 m but 0ºC at 2500 m
  • There was less snow from the recent storm in the Garibaldi zone. There was more storm snow west of the Sea to Sky and the area between the Lillooet River and Fraser River.
  • The freezing levels during the storm hovered at or just above 500m
  • A large avalanche cycle was observed. The cycle occurred for the most part toward the end of the last snow event, which ended on Monday (Mar 05) morning. The majority of the slides occurred around treeline, sometimes at quite low angles.
  • The deposits of the slides reached around the middle of the runouts and appeared as though they were very cold a dry when they slid.
  • There was significantly more wind effect in the alpine. In the alpine there were only avalanches in a few isolated areas that appeared protected from the wind.
  • West of the Pitt River there were less observed avalanches and these seemed to propagate shorter distances. Crowns averaged 40-80cm.
  • East of the Pitt River the avalanches were much larger in size even though the crowns were not as deep. Entire ridge lines up to 2000-3000m long slid during the cycle producing up to size 4.5 avalanches. Some of these ran several kilometers and over 2000 m vertical.  Most of these slides were only 30-50cm deep (March 4 SH?), but in many places stepped down (Feb 16 SH/FC?) another 40-80cm.
  • In all areas 10-20cm of low density snow was sluffing on solar aspects.
  • It appeared that there was another avalanche event about a week or two ago, but crowns and deposits were quite covered so it is hard to estimate the timeframe of this event.


SUMMARY

The snowpack finally reached a tipping point. Two buried instabilities, the Feb 16 and Mar 03 became reactive with this last storm. Cold temperatures since have slowed the stabilization process and preserved these layers. If the warm temps tomorrow aren't enough to trigger a number slides then the added load of storms forecast this coming week will likely bring a large avalanche cycle both in areas that have not slid yet as well as reloaded bed surfaces.


It is unclear if the mentioned surface hoar layers were blown away before further loading in the alpine, but the snow appears to be slightly more stable above the treeline. If the weak layers persist and wind slabs bridged the instabilities during this last snow load then large full path avalanches could be expected with this coming storm system.



Conny Amelunxen
MG


_______________________________________________
These observations and opinions are those of the person who submitted them. The 
ACMG and its members take no responsibility for errors, omissions, or lapses in 
continuity. Conditions differ greatly over time and space due to the variable 
nature of mountain weather and terrain. Application of this information 
provides no guarantee of increased safety. Do not use the Mountain Conditions 
Report as the sole factor in planning trips or making decisions in the field.
Please check out http://acmg.ca/mcr for more information.