[MCR] South Coast Mountains Avalanche and Snowpack Observations

Subject: [MCR] South Coast Mountains Avalanche and Snowpack Observations
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:17:11 +0000


I did an observation flight for a number of the industrial projects I am working on to see what came of this last storm:


In my opinion the CAA nailed the hazard forecast at Alp: Considerable, TL: Moderate, BTL: Moderate. I didn’t make it to the North Shore Mountains so can't comment there, but I would be a little extra cautious at treeline in southern Garibaldi Park, Tricouni, Ashlu Divide and Tantalus area. With the forecast warming and possible inversion be aware of the temperatures and conditions above you.


Three distinct snow zones were observed on the flight. They are illustrated in the attached map and described in more detail below.


1 Clowhom, Squamish, Ashlu Divide, Southern Garibaldi Park.

This zone received between 65-90cm of snow with the last storm with a freezing level over 850m and possibly as high as 1300m during periods of the storm.

Toward the end of the storm several large avalanches released. Their flanks and crowns are still incredibly sharp and range from 60-120cm deep. There was wide spread propagation (up to 1000m) and the slides travelled far and fast reaching valley bottom. The majority of the slides were large size2 but there were half a dozen slides of size 3.5 or greater. It appeared that all the slides released on the Jan 23 layer and nothing came out any deeper. The avalanches were observed on all aspects.


Also of note is that there were several wet slides below treeline, which was clearly a product of the high freezing levels at the start of the last storm.


Going forward my concern for this zone is that not all the slopes slid. Most slides started at ridge top and at times propagated into terrain as low angle as 25 degrees, but only about 75% of what I would consider obvious avalanche terrain had slid.


2. Calaghan, Rutherford, Miller, Northern Garibaldi, Joffre, Stein, Nahatlach, Harrsion Lake.

This area saw significantly less snow than the south with total storm snow amounts ranging from 20-50cm. It appeared that there was just not enough snow to start the Dec 23 layer going…or maybe it had already slid.


In the Mt Cailey and Fee area there were dozens of snowmobilers poking into some pretty steep terrain, but they were staying away from the regular performers and cross loaded features and had not started  a single slide that I could see.


Throughout the zone there were a handful of small (sz  1-2.5) slides that had come down during this last storm. They didn’t run as far they did farther to the south. Also interesting is that all the avalanches in this zone started low in the start zones. It appears that the weakness had already come out at ridge top in most areas. 


I would take a little extra care in the southern and western parts of this area where there may have been more snow and wind during the last storm.


3. Golden Ears, Stave, Misty, Pit area.

This area got the most snow of the entire flight with an estimate of 80-130cm of snow during the last storm at the top of treeline. It appears generally that there is more snow to the SE of the Coast Mountains than anywhere else.


Several avalanches occurred mid storm in this zone and some of them were quite deep (200cm, Jan04?). Most of the slides were covered with 20-50cm of snow. There were a few small avalanches toward the end of the storm that came out at ridge top within the storm snow, but no recent deep avalanches.



Surprised you made it this far....I had a hard time reading it all myself.

Conny Amelunxen
MG

Attachment: flight 20130208.jpg
Description: JPEG image

_______________________________________________
These observations and opinions are those of the person who submitted them. The 
ACMG and its members take no responsibility for errors, omissions, or lapses in 
continuity. Conditions differ greatly over time and space due to the variable 
nature of mountain weather and terrain. Application of this information 
provides no guarantee of increased safety. Do not use the Mountain Conditions 
Report as the sole factor in planning trips or making decisions in the field.
See http://acmg.ca/mcr for more information.
See http://informalex.org/subscribe.shtml#unsubscribe to remove your name from 
this list.